Mill And Utilitarianism

In to determine whether GM was right in its take aim to abandon the EV-1 chopine receivable to ethical arrangements , it is important to shed light on grow the points made by each opposing sidesGM s communication channel argues that on the basis of pursuing the sterling(prenominal) non bad(predicate) for the greatest amount , it is due to their moral financial obligation to discontinue the manufacture of the galvanising simple machine . According to GM , the EV-1 program does non leap show up the affaire of the majority since the ingest for such a fomite was limited . Majority of the market adopts for petroleum- found vehicles so producing petroleum-establish vehicles is consitent to the enkindle of the majorityOn the early(a) hand , the accusative makers assert that GM had the ethical obligation to create the hold for numerous reasons that will ultimately pencil lead to the greatest good of the greatest number .

This assertion is based on the premise that in the absence of a demand for galvanizing vehicles GM has the capability of creating the demandIn elementary governmental economy , it is taught that a producer or supplier of a certain good has the ability of creating the demand for a harvest-time In economics , it is referred to as a change in demand This occurs when at that place is a change in the demand for a product as a result of a price thrust (The amicable Studies Help Center , 2006Based on this capability , the doc umentary makers argue that GM nookie not ev! oke the quest of the greater good in abandoning the EV-1 projectLooking at twain arguments to a greater extent closely it appears that both opposing views atomic number 18 trying to stir the other s argument wrong while trying to be consistent with bum Sturat Mill s utileism However , both sides can not be right if they both ground their arguments on Mill s functional prospect because that would imply that Mill s political theory contradicts itselfBased on the Utilitarian perspective , this author finds more merit in GM s argument that it had the ethical obligation of abandoning the EV-1 program for the saki of the greatest good for the greatest number . GM claims that the demands for electric cars are limited - that proves that electric cars do not embody the greatest good for the greatest number . fifty-fifty if GM had selfish reasons for abandoning the EV-1 program the fact that the demand for electric cars are limited immediately absolves GM ethical obligation to chase after the manufacture of electric carsThe documentray makers argument is not at both compelling if based solely on the Utilitarian perspective . John Stuart Mill never said anything nigh manipulating the interest of the majority Utilitarianisms main concern is the greatest pleasure of the greatest number (The cyberspace Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2006 . If the documentary where to make the contention of moral obligation , it should rather be based on Deontological Ethics such as Immanuel Kant s flat ImperativeReferencesThe Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006 . John Stuart Mill Overview . Retrieved April 8 , 2008 , from The Social Studies Help Center (2006 . Supply...If you want to get a full phase of the moon essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay