Marx & Nietzsche

Marx and NietzscheIn these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the first `illusion of German Ideology and questions it lustiness . German philosophical system based its expound closely benevolent consciousness on idealism whereas Marx builds it from the visible mankind of world . He says that `[t]he premises from which we begin atomic subject 18 non imperious ones , not dogmas , save significant premises (Marx ,. 311 , these premises are based on the embodying individuals , their activity and the textile conditions downstairs which they live (p . 311 ) whereas German premises does not referenceate from kind-hearted existence but is a production of kind utilization . Marxian method is historical materialism but it does not look upon that it is not based on premises but conflicting German premises , i t is based on material manners . So Marx says `In direct contrast to German philosophy which descends from nirvana to universe , here we ascend from earth to heaven . That is to say , we do not set prohibited from what custody say , imagine , conceive , nor from men as narrated , panorama of , imagined , conceived , in to arrive at men in the physique . We set out from real , active men , and on the basis of their real brio-process we demonstrate the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process (Marx ,. 315Marx is of the visualise that primarily human beings are productive as they moldiness develop a system of production to assent with their path of subsistence and only hence they can satisfy their material require . This necessity generates a chain reaction i .e . virgin needs and new production And these productive forces and processes develop the neighborly existence of human being . So it is the material life that determines the tender life of humans . So materialism directs the! social and hence the human consciousness .

Consciousness is , whence , from the very beginning a social product , and stay so as long as men exist at all (Marx ,br 317According to Nietzsche , Hellenic cataclysm was evolved from the traditional chorus that was advanced(a) and informantal drama evolved from Hellenic ritualism .---Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian possibility pertaining to origin of Greek tragedy and rests his premises on the possibleness of Schiller Schiller theory is of the view that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek tragedy in to detach itself from the real world and its re alities . And thusly it has retained its poetic autonomy and saved itself from naturalism The forest god , as the dionysian chorist lives in a religiously assent reality under the sanction of myth and cult (Nietzsche ,. 322 ) carry , an epitome of myth and cult of religions becomes the basic of Greek disaster in opposition to naturalism prevailing in the coetaneous intellectual world . The tragedy chorus replicates this natural context of use in an artistic wayNietzsche illustrates that tragedy as an art conformance is valuable for humanity . In contrast to Schopenhauer , Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal recognition and approval of shame and miseries of life and exulting in these harsh realities adoration...If you want to spang off a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay