Thursday, February 9, 2017
Research - Young Males and Rape
Out of solely the different criminal acts of the world, statutory violation seems to be 1 of the most important fit in to recorded statistics. Over 683,000 women be frustrated per year (National fair sexs). Out of totally women who describe being raped, 54% were downstairs the era of 18 (National womans). All rape victims deserve peace and tranquility. The perpetrators deserve to requital their time. My concerns are with the judicial trunk and the biased part of the statutory rape right. The statutory rape law is biased in that there are non many women that are describe or sued for statutory rape. concord to (Russell 507), the statutory rape laws does non hold similar punishment for both sexes. Russell states that the statutory rape law favors women. His claim rests on his assumption that very a few(prenominal) fe mannishs have actually been prosecuted for allegedly insulting minor males intimately.\n all person infra the geezerhood of sixteen that is involved i n any familiar engages a nonher(prenominal) than a kiss is considered a victim and their offenders can be prosecuted. Blacks Law Dictionary 1288 (8th ed.2004). The statutory rape law originated in the thirteenth- century in England. It was scratch developed to prohibit sexual activity between adults and girls under the age of twelve. It only restricts males sexual relations with a unseasoned female. Meaning, it was not yet a execration for an\nolder women to have sexual relations with a young male. This law also helped the begin to restrict his daughter and musical accompaniment her chastity. A non-virgin female was not as popular as a virgin Female, afterwards awhile many states decided to rise their admit age to protect young girls. virtually states rose their legal consent age to twenty-one. In the 1970s, around feminists argued that the Statutory rape law should not be sexual activity specific. Finally, they said it should protect all juveniles. A juvenile is anyone under the legal consent age.\nIn California, an appellate court upheld an arrangement (San Luis Obispo Count y v. Nathan ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.