Monday, September 23, 2013

Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism Would you authorise someone to be straind to save gratuitous lives? Deontologist would grapple that you should never torture anyone because this is falsely in every(prenominal) situation. For deontologists the act is roughly important and not the consequences as the abate never justifies the means. I agree with the telegocial approach which believes that whether the something is right or wrong depends on the consequences. I would agree that you canister torture someone as the consequence is to save innocent lives which is good. A naval warship is in a battle. It receives a serve up add to the engineering section and a bring up breaks pop out. If the release off continues, the ships munitions could explode, sidesplitting the entire confederacy. The passe-partout can use a fast acting grow extinguisher that would chair in blast of steam putting out fire, tho this will kill the men pin garbage down in engineering. What should he do? What would a telegocial mind do? How would a deontological nous respond? The captain should use the extinguisher which will killed the trapped men because if he doesnt because the whole crew will die but if he does only map of the crew will die. A telegocial thinker would use the fire extinguisher because the consequence is greater than allowing the whole ship to blast.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
A deontological thinker would disagree because if the captain uses the fire extinguisher than he would kill the trapped men in the engineering section. Deontological thinkers atomic number 18 concerned close the act and not the consequences. They believe that killing people is wro ng in every situation including this situati! on. wherefore might the item that we argonnt always able to address the future be a riddle for utilitarianism? Give an example. Utilitarianism is a form of consequences which essentially claims that what are morally good are the consequences. This is a problem because we cannot predict what those consequences might be, whether doing something is for everyones better absorb or not. If we followed the utilitarians we would...If you want to get a full essay, ordering it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.